lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D6B7896.6000703@mvista.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:27:34 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To:	"TK, Pratheesh Gangadhar" <pratheesh@...com>
CC:	"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com" 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	"hjk@...sjkoch.de" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>,
	"gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"Chatterjee, Amit" <amit.chatterjee@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] Defines DA850/AM18xx/OMAPL1-38 SOC resources used
 by PRUSS UIO driver

Hello.

On 28-02-2011 7:46, TK, Pratheesh Gangadhar wrote:

>>> This patch defines PRUSS, ECAP clocks, memory and IRQ resources
>>> used by PRUSS UIO driver in DA850/AM18xx/OMAPL1-38 devices. UIO

>>      It's OMAP-L138.
> Ok.

>>> driver exports 64K I/O region of PRUSS, 128KB L3 RAM and 256KB
>>> DDR buffer to user space. PRUSS has 8 host event interrupt lines
>>> mapped to IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT0..7 of ARM9 INTC.These in conjunction
>>> with shared memory can be used to implement IPC between ARM9 and
>>> PRUSS.

>>> Signed-off-by: Pratheesh Gangadhar<pratheesh@...com>

[...]

>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-
>> davinci/devices-da8xx.c
>>> index beda8a4..4ea3d1f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c
>>> @@ -725,3 +725,76 @@ int __init da8xx_register_cpuidle(void)
>>>
>>>    	return platform_device_register(&da8xx_cpuidle_device);
>>>    }
>>> +static struct resource pruss_resources[] = {
>>> +	[0] = {
>>> +		.start  = DA8XX_PRUSS_BASE,
>>> +		.end    = DA8XX_PRUSS_BASE + SZ_64K - 1,
>>> +		.flags  = IORESOURCE_MEM,
>>> +	},
>>> +	[1] = {
>>> +		.start  = DA8XX_L3RAM_BASE,
>>> +		.end    = DA8XX_L3RAM_BASE + SZ_128K - 1,
>>> +		.flags  = IORESOURCE_MEM,
>>> +	},
>>> +	[2] = {
>>> +		.start  = 0,
>>> +		.end    = SZ_256K - 1,

>>      Huh? I don't see where it's filled...

> The current use is only to indicate memory block size to the PRUSS UIO driver when we allocate DDR memory using dma_alloc_coherent.

    Why not pass this size via the platform data? There shouldn't be "dummy" 
resources.

> sram_alloc is changed to use L3_RAM (128KB) instead of ARM RAM (8KB) in Mistral patch set - I need to follow the same convention
 > for L3 RAM as well if I need to align with that patch. Is there a better 
way to do this?

    Didn't understand about L3 RAM.
    Also, please wrap your text at 80 columns.

WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ