lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:19:49 +0000
From:	Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
To:	John Linn <john.linn@...inx.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
	glikely@...retlab.ca, jamie@...ieiles.com, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] ARM: Basic Xilinx Support

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:14:37AM -0700, John Linn wrote:
> 
> V4
> 
> I incorporated more feedback from Jamie Iles. It was 
> primariy cleanup with the only significant change
> being a move to using raw_read/write in the uncompressor
> uart code.
> 
> The other changes were minor updates so that the patch
> set applies to linux-next.
> 
> This patch set is now tested against the linux-next branch
> from pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.

Hi John,

I've just tried a quick dummy build of this series (with a fudge in 
mach-types to get it building) and I see a couple of minor sparse 
warnings:

arch/arm/mach-xilinx/common.c:54:13: warning: symbol 
'xilinx_system_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-xilinx/common.c:68:13: warning: symbol 'xilinx_irq_init' 
was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-xilinx/common.c:110:13: warning: symbol 'xilinx_map_io' 
was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-xilinx/timer.c:290:18: warning: symbol 'xttcpss_sys_timer' 
was not declared. Should it be static?

I think all of these can be resolved by including "common.h" in both 
timer.c and common.c.

I've put a couple of nitpicks for the individual patches, sorry I didn't 
spot them before.  Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>

Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ