[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D6BA377.8070305@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:30:31 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] expose kvmclock upper msr set.
On 02/28/2011 03:30 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/28/2011 03:24 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 14:16 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> > On 02/23/2011 07:44 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> > > We've been supporting kvmclock MSRs in the 0x4b564d00-0x4b564dff
>> range
>> > > for a while now, but we're not exposing it yet, meaning nobody
>> is using it.
>> > > This simple patch takes care of that.
>> >
>> > We're exposing them via KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID, leaf
>> KVM_CPUID_FEATURES.
>> >
>> Our userspace does not really use it, and rely on the capability list.
>> Historically, we've been relying on the capabilities mechanism to
>> indicate what exists and what does not.
>
> Yes. I believe this bit marked the change point.
>
> Anyway, it's exposed, and it's a lot better for userspace to make use
> of KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID since it will work on more kernels.
>
btw, it should work with -cpu host as well, no?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists