[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1298904325.2169.54.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:45:25 +0800
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -tip] perf: x86, add SandyBridge support
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 22:24 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 22:21 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > > > #define INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
> > > > EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT)
> > > > +#define INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT2(c, n) \
> > > > + EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK)
> > >
> > > That's a particularly bad name, how about something like
> > >
> > > INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT or somesuch.
> >
> > OK.
> >
> > But any case it's duplicated with PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT.
> >
> > #define PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
> > EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK)
>
> Ah, indeed, so maybe we can remove PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT and use regular
> INTEL_*_CONSTRAINTS there, that could also help for PEBS events where
> all umasks are allowed (not sure there are any such things but the SNB
> PEBS list was quite large).
Yes, there are, for example, BR_INST_RETIRED.*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists