[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110228173022.GC2165@joana>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:30:22 -0300
From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@...fusion.mobi>
To: David Fries <david@...es.net>
Cc: Liang Bao <tim.bao@...il.com>,
Andrei Warkentin <andreiw@...orola.com>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] work around for l2cap NULL dereference in
l2cap_conn_start
Hi David,
* David Fries <david@...es.net> [2011-02-27 23:03:40 -0600]:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 04:15:45PM -0300, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
> > I pushed the following patch to bluetooth-2.6 tree. It should fix the problem
> > by avoiding connections to be accepted before a L2CAP info response comes:
>
> Is
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/padovan/bluetooth-2.6.git
> the bluetooth-2.6 tree you mentioned? I don't see your patch there.
> As a side note, the inline patch in your e-mail has the tabs replaced by
> spaces, once I changed them, it applied cleanly.
>
> I first reverted to the base N900 kernel-power-2.6.28 46 (none of my
> changes or debugging), it crashed as expected. I then applied your
> patch 743400e0, and it still crashed. I added back the
> l2cap_conn_start parent check and some debugging in af_bluetooth.c
> dmesg debug output and patches follow.
I want to see a test with this patch and a recent kernel. We added many fixes
to stack in the last two years. Can you test this scenario?
--
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://profusion.mobi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists