[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1102281935260.2701@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:36:59 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: J Freyensee <james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, suhail.ahmed@...el.com,
christophe.guerard@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] Intel PTI implementaiton of MIPI 1149.7.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, J Freyensee wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 10:28 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > +static struct miscdevice pti_char_driver = {
> > > + .minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
> > > + .name = CHARNAME,
> > > + .fops = &pti_char_driver_ops
> > > +};
> > > +
> >
> > It's really strange to have both a tty and a character device that have similar
> > operations. Why can't you have the pti_char_driver functionality in the tty driver?
> >
>
> Because that is not what the customer wanted and this is why the driver
> is located in misc/ ;-).
Brilliant argument. Next time you tell us that the customer wanted a
root hole in his driver and that's why you put it there.
What's the fcking technical reason for having a char and a tty device ?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists