[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D6BF431.1090404@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:14:57 -0800
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] printk: Allocate kernel log buffer earlier
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
>
>> On larger systems, because of the numerous ACPI, Bootmem and EFI
>> messages, the static log buffer overflows before the larger one
>> specified by the log_buf_len param is allocated. Minimize the
>> potential for overflow by allocating the new log buffer as soon
>> as possible.
>>
>> We do this by changing the log_buf_len from an early_param to a
>> _setup param. But _setup params are processed before the
>> alloc_bootmem is available, so this function will now just save
>> the requested log buf len. The real work routine (setup_log_buf)
>> is called after bootmem is available.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
>> Reviewed-by: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 5 +++
>> include/linux/printk.h | 4 ++
>> init/main.c | 1
>> kernel/printk.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> Well, the modern allocation method is memblock - available on all major
> architectures.
>
> You could avoid all this ugly workaround of bootmem limitations by moving the
> allocation to memblock_alloc() and desupporting the log_buf_len= boot parameter
> on non-memblock architectures.
Is it really that ugly? I thought in some ways it cleaned it up.
I'm also hesitant to change code for other arch's when I can't test them. This
approach seemed to be the safest.
> kernel log buffer size can be configured via the .config so they will not be left
> without larger buffers.
We have asked about this, but distros are reluctant to increase memory usage
for their entire installed base. I think we're lucky they bumped it up to 256k
from the default 128k.
>
> Doing this should also have the advantage of getting all the early x86 messages into
> the larger buffer already, reducing the pressure to apply some of the other patches
> in your series.
There are only two and both remove only redundant information.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists