[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110301084209.2cfbd063.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 08:42:09 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@...ernode.on.net>,
Clemens Ladisch <cladisch@...glemail.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: compaction: Minimise the time IRQs are disabled
while isolating pages for migration
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:18:27 +0000
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:
> > BTW, can't we drop disable_irq() from all lru_lock related codes ?
> >
>
> I don't think so - at least not right now. Some LRU operations such as LRU
> pagevec draining are run from IPI which is running from an interrupt so
> minimally spin_lock_irq is necessary.
>
pagevec draining is done by workqueue(schedule_on_each_cpu()).
I think only racy case is just lru rotation after writeback.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists