linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] printk: Allocate kernel log buffer earlier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110301073533.GA12384@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 08:35:33 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] printk: Allocate kernel log buffer earlier


* Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >>+	pr_info("log_buf_len: %d\n", log_buf_len);
> >>+	pr_info("early log buf free: %d(%d%%)\n",
> >>+		free, (free * 100) / __LOG_BUF_LEN);
> >
> > Such debug printks should be removed from the final version of the patch ...
>
> Because I haven't been able to test on a fully configured
> system, this might be crucial info to figure out how to
> fix this when it happens on a customer system.  Are you
> saying this small line is any less important than the
> other thousands and thousands of seemingly meaningless
> lines?

I think you are thinking about this the wrong way.

The real fix is to never even have to think about 'how much early buffer space do we 
have left'. I.e. via the memblock allocation the buffer can be enlargened before the 
big printks happen.

btw., a sidenote, it would make sense to record cases when we 'lose' printk output, 
in the printk buffer itself. (it can be done by reserving a bit and updating the 
'lost this many bytes' portion of the buffer, or so.)

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/