[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1298975439.7828.2.camel@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 10:30:39 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] msm: scm: Mark inline asm as volatile
Hi David,
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 17:38 +0000, David Brown wrote:
> Per the gcc manual:
>
> If your assembler instructions access memory in an unpredictable
> fashion, add `memory' to the list of clobbered registers. This will
> cause GCC to not keep memory values cached in registers across the
> assembler instruction and not optimize stores or loads to that
> memory. You will also want to add the `volatile' keyword if the
> memory affected is not listed in the inputs or outputs of the `asm',
> as the `memory' clobber does not count as a side-effect of the `asm'.
> If you know how large the accessed memory is, you can add it as input
> or output but if this is not known, you should add `memory'. As an
> example, if you access ten bytes of a string, you can use a memory
> input like:
>
Right, so if you neglected to check the output from the smc block then
it would be a candidate for removal even with a memory clobber. Now I
see why you want a volatile in there!
For what it's worth:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists