[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D6D1AA8.4060809@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:11:20 -0700
From: David Ahern <daahern@...co.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...stprotocols.net, mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org,
paulus@...ba.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] perf script: dump software events too
On 03/01/2011 08:11 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> Why shouldn't it be designed to dump software events? It's called print_event().
> Its current version is rather something I would call "limited". But it
> was not designed
> to be limited.
That's because its origins are trace specific. Per last week's thread,
perf-script was perf-trace until Nov 2010. perf-script deals with
tracepoints.
>
> Ideally, we should have print_tracepoint_event() in
> trace-event-parse.c, print_software_event()
> where you want, and have print_event() in builtin-script.c that wraps on those.
process_event does not take the event sample, it takes elements of it:
struct scripting_ops {
...
void (*process_event) (int cpu, void *data, int size,
unsigned long long nsecs, char *comm);
...
};
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists