linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for March 1 (staging/winbond)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:19:22 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 1 (staging/winbond)

On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 21:10:23 +0200 Pekka Enberg wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 18:11:19 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Changes since 20110228:
> >
> >
> > commit ddee7e28e7d5e4ba2b8537c6a59b035745c250bb
> > Author: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
> > Date:   Sun Nov 28 23:00:01 2010 +0200
> >    Staging: w35und: Remove empty sysdef.h header
> >
> >
> > This header should not have been empty, since in
> >
> > commit 412dc7f368bf10a8049a8a4c41abbfd0108742e7
> > Author: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> > Date:   Fri Nov 19 09:30:18 2010 -0800
> >    staging: fix winbond build, needs delay.h
> >
> > I added delay.h to it.  And now we have the same build
> > errors that I fixed last November:
> >
> > drivers/staging/winbond/phy_calibration.c:986: error: implicit declaration of function 'msleep'
> > drivers/staging/winbond/phy_calibration.c:1555: error: implicit declaration of function 'udelay'
> > drivers/staging/winbond/reg.c:893: error: implicit declaration of function 'msleep'
> > drivers/staging/winbond/reg.c:1169: error: implicit declaration of function 'udelay'
> 
> Strange. I didn't see the problem. We should add delay.h to
> phy_calibration.c and reg.c instead. Care to make a patch?
> --

No thanks, I'll let the staging people do that.

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/