linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] PRUSS UIO driver support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110301222229.GE20497@local>
Date:	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:22:29 +0100
From:	"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Pratheesh Gangadhar <pratheesh@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hjk@...sjkoch.de, gregkh@...e.de,
	sshtylyov@...sta.com, arnd@...db.de, amit.chatterjee@...com,
	davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] PRUSS UIO driver support

On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:45:25PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
> > +
> > +	spin_lock_init(&lock);
> 
> Sigh. DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock); already initializes the lock.
> 
> It's not the purpose of a review to tell you what you need to change
> mechanically. Reviewers hint to a correct solution and you are
> supposed to lookup what that solution means and act accordingly. If
> you do not understand the hint or its implications please ask _before_
> sending a new patch set.

Correct. But I'm to blame here, too, since I suggested the wrong solution.
Sorry for that, Gangadhar!

Thanks,
Hans

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/