[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D6D74B8.4010607@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:35:36 -0700
From: David Ahern <daahern@...co.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...stprotocols.net, mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com,
paulus@...ba.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] perf record: add time-of-day option
On 03/01/2011 03:28 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> And for some silly reason I sense a time trap here (pun intended) .....
>>
>> So your pushback is:
>> 1. throw out the realtime-clock event patch,
>
> Well, no, you need continues samples to keep in sync, so having this is
> required [*].
>
>> 2. add a new CLOCK_TRACING type to clock_gettime with VDSO hook,
>
> Right, that is something we need anyway at some point in time.
>
>> 3. and use a synthesized event from userspace for snapshotting
>> perf_clock to time-of-day -- similar to what I have now, but one that
>> will guarantee a time-of-day to perf_clock correlation (versus the
>> current one which hopes that perf_clock is the monotonic clock).
>
> I guess you could do that if we have full userspace tracing support, but
> it wouldn't need synthesized events, it would need a pure userspace
> event stream.
I still don't see how this solves the need to trigger the initial sample
into the event stream.
David
>
> Thing is, I really dislike the ioctl() trigger
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists