[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110302152550.GM3319@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:25:50 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, jan.kratochvil@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal for ptrace improvements
Hey,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 04:16:50PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Assuming the program is run under simple debugger which
> resumes execution using PTRACE_CONT(sig) on signal delivery stops,
> with PTRACE_CONT(0) on ptrace stops,
> and doesn't do any PTRACE_CONT on job control stops,
> with your proposal the debugger will see and perform
> the following actions:
>
> waitpid...
> <------ kill -STOP 16382
> waitpid returns WSTOPPED, WSTOPSIG = SIGSTOP
> ptrace(PTRACE_GETSIGINFO) doesn't fail (=> it's signal delivery)
> ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, SIGSTOP)
> waitpid returns WSTOPPED, WSTOPSIG = SIGSTOP
> ptrace(PTRACE_GETSIGINFO) fails (=> it's job control stop)
> waitpid...
> <------ kill -ABRT 16382
> ...debugger doesn't wake up...
> <------ kill -WINCH 16382
> ...debugger doesn't wake up...
> <------ kill -CONT 16382
> waitpid returns WSTOPPED, WSTOPSIG = SIGTRAP (it's a ptrace-stop)
> ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, 0)
> waitpid returns WSTOPPED, WSTOPSIG = SIGWINCH
> ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, SIGWINCH)
> waitpid returns WSTOPPED, WSTOPSIG = SIGCONT
> ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, SIGCONT)
> waitpid returns WSTOPPED, WSTOPSIG = SIGABRT
> ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, SIGABRT)
>
> Correct?
Yeah, seems correct to me.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists