linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] msm: gpiomux: Remove GPIOMUX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D6DB287.4000102@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:59:19 -0800
From:	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
To:	Dima Zavin <dima@...roid.com>,
	Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@...eaurora.org>
CC:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>, dwalker@...o99.com,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] msm: gpiomux: Remove GPIOMUX_VALID and merge config enums

On 03/01/2011 06:25 PM, Dima Zavin wrote:
> Good point, ptr to anon struct would work.

Glad to know the suggestion helped.

> I would still very much like to see the helper macros be added though
> as it really would be very helpful in keeping the pinmuxing tidy in
> the board files. Doing it as a separate patch is fine.
>
> Other than the addition of helper macros, ack.

Rohit, would you mind adding the helper macros that use pointer to anon 
struct to simplify the GPIO config population in the board files? You 
can contact me offline if you need any help with it.

Thanks,
Saravana
-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/