[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m34o7ltipi.fsf@lwn.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:39:53 -0700
From: Jake Edge <jake@....net>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mjt@....msk.ru, arnd@...db.de,
mirqus@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kaber@...sh.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, therbert@...gle.com,
xiaosuo@...il.com, jesse@...ira.com, kees.cook@...onical.com,
eugene@...hat.com, dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: don't allow CAP_NET_ADMIN to load non-netdev kernel modules
I am probably missing something, but shouldn't the existing
MODULE_ALIASes stay?
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> writes:
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c b/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c
> index 6613edf..d1d0e2c 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c
> @@ -1765,4 +1765,4 @@ module_exit(ipgre_fini);
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> MODULE_ALIAS_RTNL_LINK("gre");
> MODULE_ALIAS_RTNL_LINK("gretap");
> -MODULE_ALIAS("gre0");
> +MODULE_ALIAS_NETDEV("gre0");
that is, instead of replacing MODULE_ALIAS("gre0") with the NETDEV
version, don't you want both for backward compatibility?
(if so, same goes for the other two)
jake
--
Jake Edge - jake@....net - http://lwn.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists