[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D6EA7C0.1020702@genband.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:25:36 -0600
From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@....pp.se>
CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, johnwheffner@...il.com,
linville@...driver.com, jussi.kivilinna@...et.fi,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: txqueuelen has wrong units; should be time
On 03/01/2011 09:10 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> For the case when we're ourselves originating the traffic (for instance to
> a wifi card with varying speed and jitter due to retransmits on the wifi
> layer), I think it's taking the too easy way out to use the same
> mechanisms (dropping packets or marking ECN for our own originated packets
> seems really weird), here we should be able to pushback information to the
> applications somehow and do prioritization between flows since we're
> sitting on all information ourselves including the application.
Doesn't the socket tx buffer give all the app pushback necessary?
(Assuming it's set to a sane value.)
We should certainly do prioritization between flows. Perhaps if no
other information is available the scheduler priority could be used?
Chris
--
Chris Friesen
Software Developer
GENBAND
chris.friesen@...band.com
www.genband.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists