[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103022155030.2701@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:56:37 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>,
Pratheesh Gangadhar <pratheesh@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de, sshtylyov@...sta.com,
amit.chatterjee@...com,
davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] PRUSS UIO driver support
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 March 2011 21:09:56 Hans J. Koch wrote:
> > > +static struct uio_info *info;
> > > +static dma_addr_t sram_paddr, ddr_paddr;
> > > +static void *prussio_vaddr, *sram_vaddr, *ddr_vaddr;
> >
> > So the correct thing would be
> >
> > static void __iomem *prussio_vaddr;
> > static void *sram_vaddr, *ddr_vaddr;
>
> I also commented that it should not be a global variable at
> all, but a dynamic data structure referenced from the device.
>
> Not important, but Pratheesh said he'd change it. If it stays
> a global variable, I'd at least expect an explanation why
> the static variable is considered better in this case.
I did not pick at that, because there is no indicator that we'll see
more than one PRUSS unit per SoC in the forseeable future.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists