linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] staging: xgifb: remove private ioctls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110302210127.GA20522@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:01:27 -0500
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnaud.patard@...-net.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] staging: xgifb: remove private ioctls

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:19:11PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:50:12PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> >>Drop the badly defined and broken private ioctl interface. Since the
> >>driver is in staging, and some of the ioctls are clearly unsafe or not
> >>even working, it's unlikely that there are any users.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
> >
> >Is this just a RFC, or do you want me to apply this patch?
> 
> I wasn't sure if we should try to retain all the interfaces the driver
> provides. But if there are no objections, please apply, it will help a
> lot with further cleanups.

Ok, care to resend it without the RFC then?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/