linux-kernel - Re: RFC: x86: kill binutils 2.16.x?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTi=5C3-DkOGFZ3nWCgkQMWC=Va9ZoFRjyV2vxdg7@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2011 22:28:12 +0100
From:	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Tony Breeds <tony@...eyournoodle.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: x86: kill binutils 2.16.x?

On 2 March 2011 21:11, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 12:03 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:15:14 -0800
>> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>
>>> binutils 2.16 (and presumably its prereleases, binutils 2.15.9x) appears
>>> to have more bugs than any other version of binutils released in modern
>>> history, *before or after*.
>>>
>>> We chronically run into problems because that particular binutils
>>> version breaks code that works fine elsewhere.
>>>
>>> I would like to know who would suffer from formally discontinuing
>>> support for that version.  I understand some version of SLES shipped it,
>>> but I don't know for sure.
>>>
>>
>> I gave up and became a customer of
>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/index_old.shtml
>
> Vegard,
>
> The source directory in the above doesn't seem to match the binary
> directories, and is stuck at binutils 2.16.1.  At the very best this is
> iffy from a GPL perspective, and very confusing to users.
>
> This is obviously a highly useful project, can we straighten out the
> source situation?

I only uploaded the binaries in

    http://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/old/

which should match the sources in

    http://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/src/

The binaries outside old/ are not made by me, but Tony (added to Cc).

I assume you're talking about the binaries _outside_ bin/old/, but let
me know if I'm mistaken :-)


Vegard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/