[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110302222935.GA21539@opus.istwok.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:29:35 -0600
From: David Engel <david@...wok.net>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...nel.org, lwn@....net
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32.30
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:42:02PM -0500, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:50:16PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
> > > FUJITA Tomonori (1):
> > > swiotlb: fix wrong panic
> > >
> >
> > This one breaks compilation of 64bit for me as swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() does
> > not exist. It does not look like it is a simple single patch that would get it
> > back to 2.6.32.
>
> I don't understand. Is this patch somehow broken? Is there an
> additional patch I need to apply to fix the build issue? I need more
> information here.
I think this will fix it.
Fix compilation error introduced in 484d82b6.
do_unmap_single() was renamed to swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() in
bfc5501f. Use the old name unless/until that change is also
backported.
Signed-off-by: David Engel <david@...wok.net>
diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c
index 7740ee8..0d0df11 100644
--- a/lib/swiotlb.c
+++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ dma_addr_t swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
* Ensure that the address returned is DMA'ble
*/
if (!dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size)) {
- swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, map, size, dir);
+ do_unmap_single(dev, map, size, dir);
dev_addr = swiotlb_virt_to_bus(dev, io_tlb_overflow_buffer);
}
David
--
David Engel
david@...wok.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists