[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:52:31 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, numa: move bootnode definition into srat_64.c
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> index 8e9d339..7e5d0e9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@
>
> int acpi_numa __initdata;
>
> +struct bootnode {
> + u64 start;
> + u64 end;
> +};
> +
> static struct bootnode nodes_add[MAX_NUMNODES];
>
> static __init int setup_node(int pxm)
Can we get rid of struct bootnode instead and simply reuse
struct numa_memblk? The latter isn't actually tied to memblock and is a
generic representation of a node id and address range.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists