[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 23:12:34 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] st_nlink after rmdir() and rename()
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:26:14AM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:37 PM, OGAWA Hirofumi
> > <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> wrote:
> >>
> >> And I can't only see is why you refuse to make consistent behavior (if
> >> you are saying it). It's why I said if it's _really easy_.
> >
> > The thing is, it really isn't really easy. As mentioned, it's actually
> > impossible on NFS, and it's possibly impossible on other filesystems
> > too.
>
> I don't know much about NFS though, I imaged the NFS just fill the
> stat.st_nlink to return to userland by 0 if sillyrenamed dentry? (of
> course, I'm not saying let's emulate "i_nlink >= 1" on all
> filesystems. just about i_nlink == 0) I was thinking Al is working for
> it...
No. I don't really care much about what NFS does with st_nlink. It might
be possible to fake for directories, but you'll have a hell of a time doing
that accurately for regular files. Not worth doing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists