[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 03:40:06 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <daahern@...co.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...stprotocols.net, mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org,
paulus@...ba.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf script: change process_event prototype
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:29:18AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> Prepare for handling of samples for any event type.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <daahern@...co.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 40 +++++++++++--------
> .../util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c | 20 ++++++++-
What about Perl?
> tools/perf/util/trace-event-scripting.c | 8 +--
> tools/perf/util/trace-event.h | 6 ++-
> 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> index 5f40df6..0bee150 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,27 @@ static u64 last_timestamp;
> static u64 nr_unordered;
> extern const struct option record_options[];
>
> +static void process_event(union perf_event *event,
> + struct perf_sample *sample,
> + struct perf_session *session)
> +{
> + struct thread *thread = perf_session__findnew(session, event->ip.pid);
> +
> + if (thread == NULL) {
> + pr_debug("problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
> + event->header.type);
> + return;
> + }
Seems the thread is needed by any endpoints. It would be better to resolve
it from process_sample_event and pass it to the process_event() handler.
> +
> + /*
> + * FIXME: better resolve from pid from the struct trace_entry
> + * field, although it should be the same than this perf
> + * event pid
> + */
> + print_event(sample->cpu, sample->raw_data, sample->raw_size,
> + sample->time, thread->comm);
> +}
[...]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c b/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
> index 2040b85..5b03fb6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
> @@ -204,9 +204,9 @@ static inline struct event *find_cache_event(int type)
> return event;
> }
>
> -static void python_process_event(int cpu, void *data,
> - int size __unused,
> - unsigned long long nsecs, char *comm)
> +static void python_process_event(union perf_event *pevent,
> + struct perf_sample *sample,
> + struct perf_session *session)
> {
> PyObject *handler, *retval, *context, *t, *obj, *dict = NULL;
> static char handler_name[256];
> @@ -218,6 +218,20 @@ static void python_process_event(int cpu, void *data,
> int type;
> int pid;
Please avoid such blank line in the middle of local vars declaration.
> + int cpu = sample->cpu;
> + void *data = sample->raw_data;
> + unsigned long long nsecs = sample->time;
> + char *comm;
> + struct thread *thread;
> +
> + thread = perf_session__findnew(session, pevent->ip.pid);
> + if (thread == NULL) {
> + pr_debug("problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
> + pevent->header.type);
> + return;
> + }
> + comm = thread->comm;
> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists