[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1299229125.1929.52.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:58:45 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAX8997/8966 MFD: Add IRQ control feature
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 16:45 +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> This patch enables IRQ handling for MAX8997/8966 chips.
Just trivial comments.
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c
> +static u8 max8997_mask_reg[] = {
static const?
[]
> +static struct max8997_irq_data max8997_irqs[] = {
here too?
> + [MAX8997_PMICIRQ_PWRONR] = {
> + .group = PMIC_INT1,
> + .mask = 1 << 0,
> + },
I think the declaration style is a little hard to
read and verify. Maybe use a macro something like:
#define DECLARE_IRQ(val, _group, _mask) \
[ val ] = { .group = _group, .mask = _mask }
> + [MAX8997_PMICIRQ_PWRONF] = {
> + .group = PMIC_INT1,
> + .mask = 1 << 1,
> + },
So this becomes
DECLARE_IRQ(MAX8997_PMICIRQ_PWRONR, PMIC_INT1, 1 << 0),
DECLARE_IRQ(MAX8997_PMICIRQ_PWRONF, PMIC_INT1, 1 << 1),
etc...
[]
> +static struct irq_chip max8997_irq_chip = {
static const?
> +static irqreturn_t max8997_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + struct max8997_dev *max8997 = data;
> + u8 irq_reg[MAX8997_IRQ_GROUP_NR];
[]
> + for (i = 0; i < MAX8997_IRQ_GROUP_NR; i++)
> + irq_reg[i] = 0;
Maybe use a memset or change the declaration to
u8 irq_reg[MAX8997_IRQ_GROUP_NR] = {};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists