[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <loom.20110304T095238-128@post.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 09:02:33 +0000 (UTC)
From: el es <el.es.cr@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] NVM Express driver
Andy Lutomirski <luto <at> MIT.EDU> writes:
>
> > I didn't even realize we had a firmware README file...
> >
> > Anyway, just use request_firmware_nowait(), you will be fine.
> >
>
> Unless I'm misunderstanding the spec, this is for *nonvolatile* firmware
> updates. So if I have two of these devices and I stick a firmware file
> into /lib/firmware, should it update both devices?
>
> Shouldn't reflashing the device firmware be something that the users
> asks for by something a little more specific than just creating a file?
> (In any case, creating /lib/firmware/nvmhci-3 to flash slot 3 seems
> rather silly.)
>
_lame user warning on_
if module is built-in, maybe something like /sys/class/nvm/driveX/fw_path could
receive the _path_ to firmware, so that writing to it (either/or writing to
hypothetical /sys/class/nvm/driveX/fw_do_update) would trigger the flashing
procedure, and reading it would provide _human readable_ flashing progress
information ?
If module is complied, well, as a module, could be invoked with the fw_path
parameter and the fw_do_update parameter as the safety flag.
With appropriate safety measures, like making sure drive is unmounted, queue is
empty and so on, ensured in userspace?
> --Andy
>
el es
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists