linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Syscalls: reboot: Add options to the reboot syscall to remount filesystems ro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Mar 2011 18:00:45 -0800
From:	Ken Sumrall <ksumrall@...roid.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Syscalls: reboot: Add options to the reboot syscall to
 remount filesystems ro

Writing a single byte to /proc/sysrq-trigger is an asynchronous
operation, with no obvious way to be informed that it has completed
the remount.  I did actually try this at first, but the reboot
happened before the remount finished.  I could of course add a sleep
of a few seconds, but just how long to wait is not obvious, nor is it
a guarantee that the remount will always finish in the time chosen.
I'm heading down the path of reading /proc/mounts and remounting all
read-wirte filesystems backed by a block device as read-only.

___
Ken


On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com> wrote:
>> On 11-03-03 12:45 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>
>>> If you can change whatever user-land process that does the reboot
>>> system call (and clearly you can, since you're adding new commands and
>>> using those), then why the heck don't you just do the remount-ro from
>>> that same user land?
>>
>> Is there a system call for emergency_remount_*() ?
>> I've been writing to /proc/proc/sysrq-trigger to accomplish this.
>
> So I don't know what this has to do with "emergency_remount()" - we're
> talking about a regular controlled shutdown/reset. The fact that the
> patch used the emergency_remount() code seems to be purely an
> implementation issue, nothing more.
>
> And while sysrq-trigger certainly works (when it's enabled, but that's
> true of /proc too, of course), I do think it's a rather odd way of
> solving the problem, when the simple "just remount read-only" is what
> the code actually _wants_ to do.
>
> But you're certainly right that it takes less code to open
> /proc/sysrq-trigger and writing a single byte to it than it does to do
> the straightforward "let's just do the normal mount thing".
>
>                             Linus
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/