[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110304132551.GA2407@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 08:25:51 -0500
From: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] fs: make generic file read/write functions plug
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 02:22:21PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Good catch, we need to modify that logic. If the task is currently
> plugged, it should not dispatch until blk_finish_plug() is called.
> Essentially SYNC will not control dispatch. Will allow us to clean up
> that logic, too.
<broken-record-mode>
Time to use the opportunity to sort out what the various bio/request
flags mean.
REQ_UNPLUG should simply go away with the explicit stack plugging.
What's left for REQ_SYNC? It'll control if the request goes into the
sync bucket and some cfq tweaks. We should clearly document what it
does.
REQ_META? Maybe we should finally agree what it does and decide if it
should be used consistenly. Especially the priority over REQ_SYNC in
cfq still looks somewhat odd, as does the totally inconsequent use.
</broken-record-mode>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists