[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110304102012.3ef9e7b2@jbarnes-desktop>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:20:12 -0800
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] x86: early_quirk check all bus/dev/func in domain 0
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 14:14:52 -0800
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> When we have 00:1a.0, 00:1a.1, 00:1a.2, 00:1a.7
> Found only 00:1a.0, and 00:1a.1 get processed. and 00:1a.2 and 00:1a.7 get skipped.
>
> We should only check header type on func0.
> Also should not bail out when have gap.
>
> At last try to process bus 00 - 0xff instead of only bus 00.
>
> -v2: check with VENDOR_ID instead of CLASS_DEVICE for invalid device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
I need a much better changelog here. It sounds (and looks) like the
patch is doing several things:
- processing more than the first two functions on a device
- processing the full set of busses in the first domain
- checking for nonexistent devices
Why are you making these changes? Do you have a system that needs
early quirks but violates the existing assumptions? Can you apply a
standard quirk instead?
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists