[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110304214359.GA18442@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:43:59 -0500
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging
On Fri, Mar 04 2011 at 8:02am -0500,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org> wrote:
> 2011/3/4 Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>:
> > I'm now hitting a lockdep issue, while running a 'for-2.6.39/stack-plug'
> > kernel, when I try an fsync heavy workload to a request-based mpath
> > device (the kernel ultimately goes down in flames, I've yet to look at
> > the crashdump I took)
> >
> >
> > =======================================================
> > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> > 2.6.38-rc6-snitm+ #2
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > ffsb/3110 is trying to acquire lock:
> > (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){..-...}, at: [<ffffffff811b4c4d>] flush_plug_list+0xbc/0x135
> >
> > but task is already holding lock:
> > (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8137132f>] schedule+0x16a/0x725
> >
> > which lock already depends on the new lock.
> I hit this too. Can you check if attached debug patch fixes it?
Fixes it for me.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists