[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110305220127.GA21728@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 23:01:27 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 31/37] mn10300: Use generic irq Kconfig
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 10:02:33PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 22:49, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > No functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/mn10300/Kconfig | 5 +----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/arch/mn10300/Kconfig
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/mn10300/Kconfig
> > +++ linux-2.6/arch/mn10300/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > config MN10300
> > def_bool y
> > select HAVE_OPROFILE
> > + select GENERIC_HARDIRQS
>
> Wasn't this supposed to be "select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS"?
>
> /me studying generic hardirqs...
One could hope this was nicely documented in kernel/irq/Kconfig.
But that file contains only 9 lines of comments for 10 config symbols.
Maybe it is just me but I was struggeling understanding the purpose
of these config symbols.
I found the individual bits of genirq nicely documented in most cases.
But the overall picture was/is hard to get.
And I never got enough understanding to write up something myself :-(
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists