[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D718933.1050106@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 03:52:03 +0300
From: "avagin@...il.com" <avagin@...il.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rh6] mm: skip zombie in OOM-killer
On 03/05/2011 02:41 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
>> index 7dcca55..2fc554e 100644
>> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
>> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
>> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned int *ppoints,
>> * blocked waiting for another task which itself is waiting
>> * for memory. Is there a better alternative?
>> */
>> - if (test_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE))
>> + if (test_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE)&& p->mm)
>> return ERR_PTR(-1UL);
>>
>> /*
>
> I think it would be better to just do
>
> if (!p->mm)
> continue;
>
> after the check for oom_unkillable_task() because everything that follows
> this really depends on p->mm being non-NULL to actually do anything
> useful.
Yes. You are right. Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists