[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110306110326.GA23818@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 13:03:26 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: improve comment on rcu use in irqfd_deassign
The RCU use in kvm_irqfd_deassign is tricky: we have rcu_assign_pointer
but no synchronize_rcu: synchronize_rcu is done by kvm_irq_routing_update
which we share a spinlock with.
Fix up a comment in an attempt to make this clearer.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
---
virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
index 2ca4535..3656849 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
@@ -313,8 +313,9 @@ kvm_irqfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi)
if (irqfd->eventfd == eventfd && irqfd->gsi == gsi) {
/*
* This rcu_assign_pointer is needed for when
- * another thread calls kvm_irqfd_update before
- * we flush workqueue below.
+ * another thread calls kvm_irq_routing_update before
+ * we flush workqueue below (we synchronize with
+ * kvm_irq_routing_update using irqfds.lock).
* It is paired with synchronize_rcu done by caller
* of that function.
*/
--
1.7.3.2.91.g446ac
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists