linux-kernel - Re: [RFC -tip] perf, x86: P4 PMU -- Address erratum 15 and 17

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D749A09.1060901@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:40:41 +0300
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC -tip] perf, x86: P4 PMU -- Address erratum 15 and 17

On 03/07/2011 11:27 AM, Lin Ming wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 22:49 +0800, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> On 03/05/2011 05:14 PM, Lin Ming wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 03:48 +0800, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>>>> Errata N15 and 17 of 249199-071 should be taken
>>>> into account. They are mostly hard to hit at moment
>>>> i believe but still better to be fixed.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Ming, mind to give it a shot? I seems will be able to test myself
>>>> at Wednesday only. And I would like to get a review first to eliminate
>>>> some silly mistakes ;)
>>>
>>> I'll test this next Monday when I back to office.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>
>> Great, no hurry.
> 
> This patch causes problem.
> 

Thanks Ming, i'll investigate.

-- 
    Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/