[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1299488356.9759.2.camel@pasglop>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:59:16 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: djwong@...ibm.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...pl>,
Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@...cvut.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] matroxfb: remove incorrect Matrox G200eV support
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 12:29 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> This is all quite strange -- 2.5 years ago when I wrote the patch it
> seemed to
> work ok. On newer revisions of the x3650M2 it seems broken. The
> original
> machine I wrote it for was cut up ages ago.
>
> I suppose we could simply blacklist any G200eV with a subsystem vendor
> ID of
> 0x1014 (IBM) until we figure out how to correct the driver. Our
> customers will
> be deprived, but as it seems to be broken across most of our product
> lines I
> doubt any of them are making serious use of it anyway. :)
>
> Something like this?
Does X work with the open source drivers ? In that case a better
approach would be to try to figure out what's different between the way
the 2 drivers setup the card registers and fix matroxfb..
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists