linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110307131958.84a5d818.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:19:58 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

Hi Jens,

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
block/blk-flush.c between commit 255bb490c8c27eed484d538efe6ef6a7473bd3f6
("block: blk-flush shouldn't call directly into q->request_fn()
__blk_run_queue()") from the  tree and commit
ae1b1539622fb46e51b4d13b3f9e5f4c713f86ae ("block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA
to support merge") from the block tree.

The latter rewrote a large part of the file, so I just used that.  If
this is not correct, please fix it up in the block tree.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped