linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] intel8x0m: wait a bit before warm reset check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1299494225.2470.21.camel@t41.thuisdomein>
Date:	Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:36:34 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intel8x0m: wait a bit before warm reset check

On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 10:55 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Also, as mentioned earlier, it's better to use usleep_range() than
> udelay().  There is no hard upper-limit in this case, and any longer
> sleep works.

So something like, say, usleep_range(500, 1000) should be OK?


Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/