[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinJM4YNL-H-QKtsqTWwRksK=__KUCgY5wDP-c+E@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:28:30 -0600
From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PWM v6 1/3] PWM: Implement a generic PWM framework
Lars:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de> wrote:
> On 03/06/2011 07:16 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 03/06/2011 05:17 AM, Bill Gatliff wrote:
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +pwm_set_handler() -- Defines an end-of-period callback. The indicated
>>> +function will be invoked in a worker thread at the end of each PWM
>>> +period, and can subsequently invoke pwm_config(), etc. Must be used
>>> +with extreme care for high-speed PWM outputs. Set the handler
>>> +function to NULL to un-set the handler.
>>> +
>
> This looks like a poor man's IRQ handler implementation. In my opinion something
> like pwm_to_irq would be better suited interface.
Not sure what you mean here. Can you elaborate?
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
bgat@...lgatliff.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists