[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110307102754.89EA.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:27:52 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@...arb.net>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: remove inline from scan_swap_map
> scan_swap_map is a large function (224 lines), with several loops and a
> complex control flow involving several gotos.
>
> Given all that, it is a bit silly that is is marked as inline. The
> compiler agrees with me: on a x86-64 compile, it did not inline the
> function.
>
> Remove the "inline" and let the compiler decide instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@...arb.net>
> ---
> mm/swapfile.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index 0341c57..8ed42e7 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ static int wait_for_discard(void *word)
> #define SWAPFILE_CLUSTER 256
> #define LATENCY_LIMIT 256
>
> -static inline unsigned long scan_swap_map(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> - unsigned char usage)
> +static unsigned long scan_swap_map(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> + unsigned char usage)
I agree.
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists