[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikTEi8uKeCfPLoenNx9g6fLyAqNqfVdR=4KzNB3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 05:09:09 -0800
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux390@...ibm.com, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make *_gate_vma accept mm_struct instead of task_struct
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca> wrote:
> Morally, the question of whether an address lies in a gate vma should be asked
> with respect to an mm, not a particular task.
>
> Practically, dropping the dependency on task_struct will help make current and
> future operations on mm's more flexible and convenient. In particular, it
> allows some code paths to avoid the need to hold task_lock.
Reviewed-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
May I suggest ia32_compat instead of just compat for the flag name ?
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists