linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] SCM fixes and updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:29:06 -0800
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] SCM fixes and updates

On 02/24/2011 10:44 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> These are a few updates to SCM. The first two patches fix some
> bad code generation. The next patch saves a couple instructions
> on the slow path and the final patch determines the cacheline
> size dynamically instead of statically.
>
> Stephen Boyd (4):
>   msm: scm: Mark inline asm as volatile
>   msm: scm: Fix improper register assignment
>   msm: scm: Check for interruption immediately
>   msm: scm: Get cacheline size from CTR
>

Can we queue up patches 1 to 3 from this series for the next window? It
looks like everyone is ok with them. I'll respin the fourth patch once I
figure out where to go with it.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/