[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110309194501.GA9362@albatros>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:45:01 +0300
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, serge.hallyn@...onical.com, morgan@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] capabilites: allow the application of capability
limits to usermode helpers
Eric,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 14:33 -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> someone complained that any user with
> cap_net_admin was able to load arbitrary kernel modules, even though the user
> didn't have cap_sys_module. The reason is because the actual load is done by
> a usermode helper and those always have the full cap set.
AFAIU, your patch sets system-wide caps for _all_ usermode helpers,
right? Then it does nothing with cap_net_admin's problem as it should
restrict caps of specific helpers spawned from specific networking code,
but not touching anything related to another helpers.
> sysctls which allow us to bound the permissions of usermode helpers.
>
> /proc/sys/kernel/usermodehelper/bset
> /proc/sys/kernel/usermodehelper/inheritable
>
> You must have CAP_SYS_MODULE to change these (changes are &= ONLY).
> When the kernel launches a usermodehelper it will do so with these as
> the bset and pI.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists