[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110309134504.6d850802.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:45:04 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hong Liu <hong.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RESEND] Putting the device into runtime suspend after
resume()/probe() is handled
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:39:34 +0000
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH, RESEND] Putting the device into runtime suspend after resume()/probe() is handled
> Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:39:34 +0000
> User-Agent: StGIT/0.14.3
>
> From: Hong Liu <hong.liu@...el.com>
>
> by the PM core and the device core code. No need to manually add them in
> each single driver. And correct the runtime state in remove().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hong Liu <hong.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
I'd merged this a while back but was awaiting info on why v1 had a
cc:stable so the changelog could be updated to indicate why a -stable
backport was needed.
I see that the cc:stable has been removed so that settles that. But
it's still unclear how serious the bugs-which-were fixed are. Oh well,
a bug's a bug. I put it in my 2.6.38 queue anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists