[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110309144353.387d946e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:43:53 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: check zone->all_unreclaimable in
all_unreclaimable()
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:37:04 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 08:45:51 +0900
> Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
> Hmm, should I support a sacrifice feature 'some signal(SIGINT?) will be sent by
> the kernel when it detects system memory is in short' in cgroup ?
> (For example, if full LRU scan is done in a zone, notifier
> works and SIGINT will be sent.)
>
Sorry, this sounds like "mem_notify" ;), Kosaki-san's old work.
I think functionality for "mem_notify" will have no obstacle opinion but
implementation detail is a problem....Shouldn't we try it again ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists