[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110309151900.0403.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:20:16 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] proc: make check_mem_permission() return an mm_struct on success
> This change allows us to take advantage of access_remote_vm(), which in turn
> enables a secure mem_write() implementation.
>
> The previous implementation of mem_write() was insecure since the target task
> could exec a setuid-root binary between the permission check and the actual
> write. Holding a reference to the target mm_struct eliminates this
> vulnerability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>
OK, I like this idea. So, I suppose you will resend newer version as applied Al's
comment and I'll be able to ack this.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists