[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110310224939.F926.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:08:39 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, avagin@...il.com,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: check zone->all_unreclaimable in all_unreclaimable()
> Hi,
>
> Hmmm...
> If I could observed your patch, I did support your opinion. but I didn't. so, now I'm
> curious why we got the different conclusion. tommorow, I'll try to construct a test
> environment to reproduce your system.
Hm,
following two patches seems to have bad interaction. former makes
SCHED_FIFO when OOM, latter makes CPU 100% occupied busy loop if
LRU is really tight.
Of cource, I need to run more much test. I'll digg it more at this
weekend (maybe).
commit 93b43fa55088fe977503a156d1097cc2055449a2
Author: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lclaudio@...g.org>
Date: Mon Aug 9 17:19:41 2010 -0700
oom: give the dying task a higher priority
commit 0e093d99763eb4cea09f8ca4f1d01f34e121d10b
Author: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Date: Tue Oct 26 14:21:45 2010 -0700
writeback: do not sleep on the congestion queue if there are no congested BDIs or if significant conge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists