lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1299768818.15854.343.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:53:38 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3]trace-cmd: remove dead code

On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 17:57 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> filter_cpu related code is totally dead.

I'll rephrase this, as it is not dead. "dead" code is code that can not
be reached. This code most certainly can be reached. You may think it is
silly code, which it may be. The reason for the separation of one CPU
and multiple CPUs, is I do one CPU more often than I filter multiple,
and I wanted the 1 cpu to still be efficient.

-- Steve

> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  trace-read.c |   10 +---------
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/trace-read.c b/trace-read.c
> index 0e9ced8..1cd9bd3 100644
> --- a/trace-read.c
> +++ b/trace-read.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ static const char *input_file;
>  static int multi_inputs;
>  static int max_file_size;
>  
> -static int filter_cpu = -1;
>  static int *filter_cpus;
>  static int nr_filter_cpus;
>  
> @@ -619,10 +618,6 @@ get_next_record(struct handle_list *handles, int *next_cpu)
>  				record = tracecmd_read_data(handles->handle, next_cpu);
>  			else
>  				record = NULL;
> -
> -		} else if (filter_cpu >= 0) {
> -			cpu = filter_cpu;
> -			record = tracecmd_read_data(handles->handle, cpu);
>  		} else
>  			record = tracecmd_read_next_data(handles->handle, &cpu);
>  
> @@ -963,10 +958,7 @@ void trace_report (int argc, char **argv)
>  		case 0:
>  			switch(option_index) {
>  			case 0: /* cpu */
> -				if (filter_cpu)
> -					add_cpu(optarg);
> -				else
> -					filter_cpu = atoi(optarg);
> +				add_cpu(optarg);
>  				break;
>  			case 1: /* events */
>  				print_events = 1;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ