lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D790F4B.2030908@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:50:03 -0800
From:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mrubin@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH trace-cmd 3/3] Revert "trace-cmd: Use conditional assignment
 of CC and AR"



On 03/10/2011 05:11 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 22:43 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
>
>>> I don't know the answers, but if we take the kernel Makefile as a
>>> template, then setting CC doesn't work.
>>
>> The kernel is a bit special I believe as it is pretty tied to gcc. Is
>> trace-cmd tied to gcc to such a degree that we want to make it difficult
>> for people to try different compilers?
>
> True, trace-cmd is tied more to glibc (special features) than gcc.
>
> I just looked at the Makefile for evolution, and it has:
>
> CC = gcc
>
> So it is not limited to just the kernel.

I think we're down to a subjective argument over "correctness". Any of 
the resent proposals will work for me.


-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ