[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1299792860.15854.423.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:34:20 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, sam@...nborg.org,
ddaney@...iumnetworks.com, michael@...erman.id.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] jump label: update for .39
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 16:14 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Just insert a long "Reserved" word.
>
> I agree that this solution can work, but it's only because the
> "object" definition is done in assembly in this case (and not in C, like
> we did for trace event and tracepoints). Padding to power of 2 multiples
> should make the linker happy. There should be a nice comment beside
> these padding elements though.
Rereading what David and even what you wrote just now, I don't think
this is even needed. As you said. The issue with us is that we had
defined structs in C as static which lost all bets. Not to mention,
these structures were not natural word aligned.
The linker should not be adding holes more than natural word alignment.
Why waste space?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists